Jesper De Jong vs Matic Spec Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W L L
Form
L L W L L W L W W LCara A Cara: Jong 1 - 0 Spec
Ellas han jugado 3 conjuntos en total, con Jong victoriosa 2 y Spec victoriosa 1. El último partido entre Jong y Spec fue en el Qatar F6 (Doha), el 19-12-2018, Cuartos de Second, Hard, con Jesper De Jong obteniendo la victoria 4-6 6-1 6-3
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jesper De Jong | 1 |
| Matic Spec | 0 |
Qatar F6 (Doha)(19-12-2018)
4
6
6
1
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Matic Spec
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 1 |
| 16 | Juegos Ganados | 10 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Faltas dobles totales | 9 |
| 2:29:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 2:29:0 |
| 66% (54/82) | % De Primer Servicio | 58% (56/96) |
| 72% (39/54) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 68% (38/56) |
| 57% (16/28) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 43% (17/40) |
| 31% (4/13) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 43% (41/96) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 33% (27/82) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Jesper De Jong
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
26 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Jesper De Jong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Lloyd Harris
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Jesper De Jong
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Sebastian Ofner
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Titouan Droguet
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Matic Spec
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (266/159) | Win/Loss | 64% (167/95) |
| 60% (587/385) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (364/222) |
| 55% (5030/4193) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (3011/2415) |
| 67% (87/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (94/59) |
| 64% (154/85) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (59/31) |
| 47% (21/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 74% (14/5) |
| 36% (4/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1709 | Aces Total | 440 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1082 | Total Double Faults | 485 |
| 1:39:28 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 379.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.35 |
| 60% (17256/28649) | 1st Serve % | 58% (5307/9198) |
| 70% (12090/17256) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3634/5307) |
| 51% (5809/11393) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1944/3893) |
| 43% (1315/3076) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (440/1041) |
| 41% (11985/28911) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3922/9317) |
| 61% (20/13) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (15/16) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (125/81) | Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 69% (105/47) | Futures W/L | 64% (166/93) |
| 63% (254/406) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (163/258) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (74/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (31/55) |
| 52% (65/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (30/64) |
| 89% (261/231) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (162/147) |
| 11% (261/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (162/15) |
| 20% (164/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (100/19) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
